Qaz.Vision

Vision of Kazakhstan through documents and public positions

A unified corpus of documents, theses, and public positions.

At a glance

Find statements by person, office or topic, with links to sources.

Project snapshot

Find a statement and check its source

Choose a topic and period, open a document and compare positions. Each record lists available languages and its source; missing text or translations are marked separately.

Documents 3463 catalog records, including materials without available full text
Theses 9175 recorded theses; text availability is checked separately
Source 98.7% cards are linked to a known primary source
Latest year 27.0% of the corpus belongs to the latest yearly layer
Coverage profile

Corpus density by year

Open coverage.json
2014 2
2015 3
2016 2
2017 4
2018 1
2019 27
2020 36
2021 33
2022 256
2023 425
2024 848
2025 891
2026 935
Known primary source98.7%
Latest year27.0%

The historical corpus layer is curated. Percentages describe the shape of the current public snapshot, not the completeness of an external archive.

Source: public coverage.json Open coverage.json

Sections and corpora

Purpose

Qaz.Vision is a platform for reading and analyzing a confirmed public corpus, helping users quickly see priorities, topics, and the language of decisions.

Who it serves

1
Public media

For quickly finding quotes, theses, and supporting wording while preparing stories.

2
Press offices

For fast access to official positions, assignments, and related documents.

3
Research centers

For monitoring topic areas and preparing analytical products from the corpus.

How the public layer works

What it includes
  • Published documents, speeches, interviews, articles, and confirmed working materials from role and personal corpora.
  • A single document card with date, type, languages, source links, and topic navigation.
  • Thesis annotation, A–G topic blocks, and links between documents, theses, and positions.
What Qaz.Vision does not promise
  • It is not a complete archive of every media mention, retelling, or external interpretation.
  • A missing item does not mean the event did not happen: the document may not yet have been included or confirmed.
  • Summary figures help with orientation but do not replace reading the source document and publication context.
How to read freshness
  • Page counters and JSON reflect the current published snapshot at request time.
  • The freshness date records the latest confirmed corpus event, not an instantaneous update of every topic.
  • For external links, use the snapshot date and API and data , rather than only the absolute document count.
Role and personal snapshots

Methodology

1. Selection

Only published materials tied to a source and a specific public role enter the corpus.

2. Structure

Each document gets a card, language versions, document type, and source links.

3. Theses

Documents are split into theses assigned to A–G topic blocks, forming the basis for position navigation.

Coverage and boundaries

Qaz.Vision is a research collection, not an exhaustive legal archive. The status page reports updates and source reconciliation. Historical coverage is selective; annual document counts do not measure a politician's activity. A catalog record does not mean its full text or translation is cleared for publication.

3463documents
9175recorded theses
98.7%cards with a source
27.0%of the corpus is from the latest year
Documents
YearDocuments
20142
20153
20162
20174
20181
201927
202036
202133
2022256
2023425
2024848
2025891
2026935
Stored texts by language
Stored texts by languageDocuments
Russian3454
Kazakh2135
English284

A stored text is not necessarily cleared for display. Until rights are confirmed, only metadata and source links are public. One document may have multiple language versions.

Full machine-readable matrix: coverage.json.

How to read evidence

Direct speech

First-person wording or an exact line from a speech, interview, or address.

Attributed statement

An official source directly reports that a politician noted, stated, instructed, or emphasized something.

Editorial fact

A description of an event, appointment, or procedure. It supports document checking but is not published as a politician's position.

Corrections and reuse

Report an error

Include the card URL, disputed wording, and primary-source link. The public issue log is available through GitHub Issues.

Create an issue ↗
Rights and citation

Rights to source texts belong to their publishers. When using metadata and analytical annotation, cite Qaz.Vision, the document card, and the official primary source. No separate open license is granted for source texts.

Theses are generated automatically and pass structural checks. For material conclusions, consult the full text and official source.